WEBMAZE Community
Gorean Roleplay => Tuchuk Wagon Camp => MTC IC => Topic started by: Jay on April 16, 2007, 05:23:43 PM
-
Adilah is not to be served by any slave until Ubar deems otherwise.
-
-a soft nod of my head greeted my perusal of the words, and then I signed in my round, feminine hand-
yes, my Master, it will be as you say.
-
(http://www.webmaze.com/memberpages/prism/footprint.gif)
yes Master
-
adds her mark also
aye Master read an understood..
-
-puts my lil whisker marks up there too-
yes, Master
-
read and understood Master
kadi
-
~leaves her mark~
aye Master, read and understood
-
yes Master
kiah{MTC}mat-restricted
-
fully understood, Master
-
- reads His words and nods - read and understood Master
-
He can be served and given another chance. Any abuse or stupidity.... summon a Warrior to take care of business.
-
yes Master
-
Yes, Master Ubar.
-
yes Master Ubar
-
Aye Master
-
flame and leo,
Make sure you specify to which Master you are responding (and if it was to Master Ubar, he is always given his title in a slave's reply). Master Ubar has changed Master Tegutai's directive, and the ban on serving Master Adilah is no longer in effect. I want to make sure you guys read further down the thread, rather than just the first post, and are aware of the change! -smiles-
-
ai Master Ubar read and understood
kadi
-
some of us privately owned slaves are still not permitted to serve, just wanted to clarify that to the rest, as my Master has told me
-
Understood M'Guardian
-
read the update and understood...
Taryn Iona
-
yes sis..flame understands and did read it all. was my mistake not to respone correctly..
yes Master Ubar
-
read an understood Master Ubar....
echos the reply by her sister re the private order from private owners...
but lil sister Master Ubar's order overrides all.. i belive that is correct.. looks to dee for confirmation???
-
It's usually best if the Ubar's wishes are followed, of course, as a show of trust in his judgment. However, a private owner's specific directives are usually honored, unless those commands are in direct opposition to a basic room rule. For example, all privately owned slaves should still adhere to the rules for entering and leaving our home, following the correct serving order, greeting properly, and so on. In the case of serving restrictions, such are usually left to the discretion of the owner. After all, that is the owner's personal property, and her body and how that body is used -- whether being used sexually, being fed by another's hand, sitting on another's lap, being pm'd, etc. -- is the owner's right to dictate.
And my Master shares my conception of this. (He was about to post exactly this same thing and decided I could add his opinion for him to save his time and effort -grins-.)
Of course, we could both be wrong, but that's always how we have seen the line drawn in the past.
-
thank you sis..
-
*reads and leaves a small whisper*
aye Master Ubar
-
yes Master Ubar
-
yes, Master Ubar.